Dev Anand: The Immortal of Indian Cinema

I am not a film expert and I have never met Dev Anand. At the time when I was born, Dev Anand was a 60 year old man, the age of my grandfather. 

Yet, today when I have come to know of the news of his death I am sad. There are legions of his fans who share the same emotion like me. Everyone loved him even if everyone did not love the movies that he did recently.

 

Does it matter? No. Because Dev Anand lived his life on his own terms. Like in one of his songs, “Gham aur khushi mein fark na mahsus ho jaha, mein dil ko us makam pe lata chala gaya.” He and his films are above comparison. To be honest, even though I belong to the age of fast paced films, he will remain my favourite actor ever.

The first movie of his that I saw was Jewel Thief much to the insistence of my mother. To my mother, he is the best actor and the most handsome man after my father.

After I watched Jewel Thief, I went into another world. A world of movies that was indeed better than the one I was living in. All the songs, and especially ‘Aasman ke neeche’, appealed to my ears and the way he wooed the beautiful Vyjayanthimala  in that song made a non-romantic guy like me feel for once to fall in love. That was his power. To make you feel the way ‘he’ wanted. One by one, I started watching his movies.  

Thus, I saw the entrapped detective in CID, the indifferent husband in Tere Mere Sapne, the longing brother in Hare Rama Hare Krishna and the titular character of the iconic Guide.

Indeed I discovered that Dev Anand stood above all other actors of his era and the present one too. Talking about era, Dev Anand is the only actor who looked dapper in both black & white and colour films.

In 1965 Dev Anand acted in Teen Deviyan (a B&W film) and Guide (a colour), making him the only actor to have done so in the same year. Both were successful but Guide went notches higher to become a benchmark in Indian cinema.

With Guide, Dev saab (as he was popularly called) won his second Filmfare award. His first had come in 1958 with Kalapani.

As an actor extraordinaire, Dev Anand was the only Hindi film star who delivered blockbusters over three decades in three different images. As a man extraordinaire, Dev saab was the epitome of positive energy.

With his death from a cardiac arrest in London on Saturday, India lost a glittering star that illuminated the country’s cinema landscape for over 50 years. The whole of Bollywood has gone into a state of mourning. Amitabh Bachchan has himself admitted that he has left a void that cannot be filled. True.

When Dev Anand began his film career, it was a year before India got its Independence. His debut movie, Hum Ek Hain, was under the then famous banner of Prabhat Talkies in 1946. Though the film was a flop, he went on climbing the ladder of success with movies like Ziddi, Baazi, Paying Guest, Munimji, CID, Jaal and many more.

His friendship with Guru Dutt produced three biggies that redefined cinema of the 50s – Baazi, Jaal and CID. Their partnership was like the one that Martin Scorsese and Leonardo Di Caprio share today.     

Another of his friends was Kishore Kumar who sang a number of hit songs for his movies. Who doesn’t loves to hum ‘Ye dil na hota bechara’ or ‘Khwab ho tum ya koi haqueekat’ or even ‘Phoolon ke rang se’?

Songs were a speciality of Dev Anand films. Mohammed Rafi delivered hits like 'Main zindagi ka saath' and 'Abhi na jao chorkar'. 'Din dhal jaaye' and 'Tere mere sapne' from Guide are classics that are not made today.

 

He was a very educated man of his times having acquired a degree in English Literature from the prestigious Government College in Lahore, Pakistan. He started working for the military censor office in Bombay. His older brother Chetan was already associated with theatre. He joined in and soon got his entry in the world of cinema.

From 1946 to the year of his death, Dev Anand remained active in Indian cinema. He was one of those titans who saw the complete evolution of Hindi film industry. He was there when Bombay was ‘handmaking’ movies. He was also there when Bombay became Bollywood and is belting out movies, both sensible and senseless, at a mechanical speed.

Frankly speaking, it was Dev Anand who introduced India and Indian cinema to fashion. The clothes he wore have been different in each of his films. The hats, the scarves, the hairstyle, the suit and the shirt, everything was unique and looked perfect on him.

Believe me, if Sherlock Holmes were to be made in Hindi, only Dev Anand would have looked best in the ace detective’s trademark deerstalker. An iconic picture in Jewel Thief is proof of it.

The great actor held on his own fort in the presence of giants like Dileep Kumar, Raj Kapoor, Rajendra Kumar and Rajesh Khanna.

His carved out his own image that of an actor with a distinct head-nodding, a slightly tilted way of walk, a smile with a little shake of head, expressive eyes and of course his unmatched acting prowess. No wonder then that the ladies of those days went weak in their knees at the sight of Dev Anand.

Yes, I also came to know that he picked up the head-nodding style from Hollywood legend Gregory Peck but I have also seen Guns of Navarone of the latter and found that Dev Anand was in an altogether different league. What he did was what only he could do. That’s why he was honoured with the Dada Saheb Phalke in 2002.

He took to directing movies early in his career and gave cult classics like Hara Rama Hare Krishna and Prem Pujari. The music of the former was so ahead of its era that a recent release titled itself on the lead song of that film. The new one was, however, disappointing and crass.

As a fan I personally feel that no film of Dev Anand should be remade as it will for sure destroy the beauty of the original. The romantic image of Dev Anand is unparalleled even to this day and it should be allowed to remain untouched.

I had a hidden desire to meet him. He was a man who delivered flops one after the other in recent times but continued doing films purely because he loved doing it. In my opinion he was the man who ideally followed the principle of the Bhagvad Gita: “Karam karo, phal ki chinta mat karo” (do your work, don’t worry about the result). Perhaps this is why he became an immortal.  

Since he was a man who with a never say die attitude, I will suppress my grief as a mark of respect to the icon and only say – “Jivan ke safar mein rahi, milte hai bichar jaane ko, aur de jaate hai yadein, tanhai mein tarpane ko….o ho, o ho, o ho, o ho, oho oho.”

RIP Dev Anand sir

India needs doctors, not MBAs

Yesterday I was talking to a boy - a trainee in the company I work for - about his goal in life. He was more than happy to tell me that he was attending a coaching institute where they prepare students to face one of the countless MBA entrance exams. I am a journalist not an MBA and therefore I asked him whether it was necessary for someone to obtain a Business Management qualification. He gave me a perplexed glance, raised his eyebrows and replied in an accentuating manner, “Of course, it is.”

“Everyone is going for an MBA. Why? Because it guarantees you a good job with a fat paycheque,” he said in an excited way. The conversation then proceeded to other things.

Just a few days back I read in a regional newspaper about a boy in a small town who fell from a tree seriously injuring his liver. The report said that he was bleeding profusely and was taken to a nearby medical center. His family was mulling over the possibility of taking him to a top hospital in the city. The problem was that the distance to the hospital in the city was of a good measure and the doctor treating the boy in the local medical center knew that he may not survive the distance. Therefore, this doctor took it upon himself to save the boy’s life. According to reports, his treatment kept the boy alive and fit enough for shifting to the hospital in the city. The boy survived.

Imagine the fate of the boy had that doctor opted for a career in Business Management early in his life. Frankly speaking, India needs more doctors than MBAs.

According to various reports, India has approximately 6,00,000 doctors. Data available with the World Health Organisation puts that figure to 6,60,801 as in 2005. India has a population of over a billion. In approximate figures that translates to 1 doctor per 1,800 people.  Countries like Brazil and Thailand are better off with a ratio of 1:844 and 1:500 respectively. No need to think of Germany which has a ratio of 1:296.

Worse is the fact that a majority of doctors or, in other words, the medical facilities are concentrated in urban areas of the country. There are many areas in rural India where there is a serious dearth of proper medical services. Those areas are dominated by quacks (unqualified people posing as doctors) and/or practitioners of Ayurveda, Unani, Homeopathy or Siddha. The later ones provide basic medical treatment but cannot operate on a person in the case, say for example, of the boy I wrote about above.

Even in the urban areas, the government run hospitals are few and far between. Add to it the pathetic conditions of many of them and you have the perfect threat to the dream of a developed India. Most of the hospitals are privately run, a majority of which charge a fees that may put an average Bollywood actor to shame. There is no need to discuss the government as every Indian is aware of how it functions.

Talking about government, India’s closest competitor is way ahead. China had 19, 05,436 registered medical practitioners for its population as in 2009 according to the WHO. Yes, China presently holds the distinction of being the most populated country in the world but India will soon surpass it. Consider then the situation here. 

We are in dire need of more doctors. We also need to stop the tendency of medical practitioners to leave for foreign shores. According to a report, there are nearly 60,000 Indian doctors in countries like US, UK, Australia and Canada alone.

Interest in a career in medicine must be increased. Better opportunities should be created in India itself for the doctors to stay back. More colleges are needed without compensating on the quality of education. Medical research must be given a boost.

The Medical Council of India lists 335 medical colleges imparting education in India. Compare this to the 1600 odd MBA colleges and you know where the country is heading.

Doing good business can never become the parameter of gauging a country’s overall development status. Of all the countless number of MBA graduates that we produce in India, 60 percent are fools, 30 percent know how to fool others and only 10 percent are the real MBAs.

Nearly every Sales Executive whether in a retail store or at your door is an MBA from an institution which may be operating out of a rented apartment. There are many MBAs who were unable to even pass their school exams properly, if you know what I mean. Barring those who pass from the elite IIMS or a handful of other equally competent colleges, nearly all of them are aimless people. In other words, since they were not good in any other discipline, they chose MBA for the simple reason because it is easy to pass if it is not from the IIMs or the other competent ones. They are the fools.

Some go for an MBA with dreams of becoming as ‘wealthy’ as Tata or Birla. Nobody wants to ‘be’ a Tata or Birla. They fail to see the hardships these legends of business faced to build their empires where it stands today. Such MBAs always try to take the shortcut to earning more money. They will never back down from fooling a gullible person into buying something which he/she may not need at all. They are those who fool others.

Over the last few years some innovative minds have come out with new business models that are essential for economic as well as social development. They face political, financial or other problems but continue doing their work. These are the real MBAs. They have the potential to give a positive direction to a business and society equally. Interestingly, many of them do not have an MBA qualification at all.

If the government continues to allow opening of MBA institutions on the premise of making India a developed nation, it will have disastrous consequences in the long run. The people of India need more doctors and medical researchers to counter the ever rising cases of unknown diseases. The Japanese Encephalitis is one such example where lack of proper medical facilities claimed more than 800 lives. The government should stop boasting about Medical Tourism if it cannot protect its own people on the ground.

By 2031 there will be a shortfall of close to a million doctors. According to the planning commission, India is short of six lakh doctors, a million nurses and almost two lakh dentists. What will India do with the money if the people do not live to enjoy the wealth?

It is the duty of the government to take concrete measures in protecting the people of the country. More needs to be spent on health, especially public sector. According to reports, of the 5.1 percent of the GDP spent on health an approximate 17 percent only is spent on the public sector.

Improving the economy is good but it should not come at the cost of lives. Bundles of money and batches of MBAs could not have been able to achieve what that doctor did in the small town. After all, saving a life is incalculably valuable than a billion dollar business plan.

Are you Brave?

I have been inspired to write on this by the various situations that life put me into and those that happened around me. The inspiration had actually come many times before but the idea took shape when I witnessed an altercation between young boys in my neighborhood.

 

Such things happen almost every five minutes in different parts of the world. The winner of such altercations is declared brave by the people. Hooliganism by the youth is dangerous for any society. The sad part is that many people think that if a man yields muscle power over others and wins the fights he enters into, he is a brave individual. (I used the word ‘many’ because there are some people who have an intellect.) The people who avoid such confrontations or squabbles are eventually branded as cowards. I have always avoided unnecessary fights or arguments. This has resulted in some people taking me to be a coward. Interestingly, these people will not come forward to stand beside me if I get involved in any such stupid fight. I believe that a brave man should always fight for his right, for the right of the meek, the elderly, the women, the children and the country. In fighting between sections of the society should always be avoided and especially between the youth.

Bravery or courage doesn’t have a perfect definition. This is the reason why people have misconstrued the whole meaning. Swami Vivekananda had said, “If you really want to judge the character of a man, look not at his great performances”. When surrounded by enemies even a cat wouldn’t give up without a fight. This doesn’t mean that the cat is as brave or courageous as the Lion. Fate plays a very important role in the great performances a man puts up. The real character of the man comes to light only by proper observation of his most common actions. The common actions include everything from walking, talking and treating other people of different classes. 

Chanakya, in his Arthashastra, mentioned four elements of polity. They are: saam, daam, dund and bheda meaning speech, money, punishment and planting respectively. The idea is to use any or all of the techniques in such a way that the desired work is done when dealing with another person or group. The elements can be interchanged according to the circumstances but it has been historically recommended that saam should be used first and the last should be dund. 

On a personal note, I wouldn’t like to boast of my acts of courage but in short I can say that yes, I have helped the elderly and my friends from both sexes in times of danger. However, I never entered a fight. I might not be an astute politician but I prefer to use my brain before my muscles. It is known as a fact that the brain is the most powerful weapon and God gave it to us all. Fortunately, he didn’t tell us how to use it and ultimately left it for us to figure out. I might be able to hit four guys at a time and there is a higher chance that I might get bashed up. Whatever the result be, if the fight is for unnecessary reasons then none of us is brave. 

Courage comes from the inside. In the animal world, there are many animals physically larger and stronger than the Lion but it the Lion who is considered King of the Beasts. Do you know why? The reason is that all the big and strong creatures will flee if they see their prey charging towards them in large numbers but the lion will not. If he is hungry, he will try to hunt down his prey from amongst the many charging towards him even if it means risking his life. Wildebeests always move in herds and there have been incidents when the lion had to face the herd head on, still he managed to kill one of them for food while the others gave up the fight. The Lion draws his courage from his mind and heart. We should learn from him.

How a person deals with pressure situations, how he/she faces all hurdles and emerges victorious; these and such other questions will decide how bold the person actually is. Life is hard and most of the times problems are worst in their non physical forms. The courageous fights such unforeseen situations or the invisible enemy and conquers it. The mind of a person is both the enemy and the friend. There has been enough news on students or people taking an extreme step when they failed in their examinations or in some endeavour. According to me, they may not have failed had their mind not failed them.

Here I am reminded of a saying in the Bhagvad Gita:

“One should save oneself by oneself;

One should not lower oneself;

For oneself is verily one’s own friend;

One is verily one’s own enemy”.

- Bhagvad Gita (6:5)

Before claiming to be a brave individual, just answer these questions:

Have you ever helped a needy or an elderly or a woman?

Have you saved anyone’s life (even if it is an animal) with or without risking your own?

Have you opposed injustice?

Finally, do you have the guts to give up your life for your country?

If the answer to anyone of the above is no, then you are not brave.

The India for which Anna fights

Anna Hazare has been arrested by the Delhi police. The famed Gandhian was about to begin his fast unto death against corruption at the JP Park in the capital of the country. However, the government and the police turned the tables on Team Anna by not only imposing sec 144 a day before but arresting many who had gathered at the venue in his support.

The entire area was cordoned off and in a matter of minutes the colour of khaki had replaced white. None was spared, not even the senior civil-society members who have a reputation of their own. Thus Kiran Bedi, Kejriwal and Prashant Bhushan saw themselves getting packed into buses for a destination not disclosed. Many are protesting on the streets and some are courting arrest.

Almost everyone in this country is aware of what Anna is fighting for. The 74-year-old, born as Kisan Baburao Hazare, was already a known figure in parts of India (he was honoured with the Padma Bhushan in 1992). However, his rise to fame came only this year when he chose to fast unto death on April 5. Though the fast ended in four days but by then waves of supporters from many parts of India had joined him forcing the government to agree on a Jan Lokpal Bill to check graft in public offices.

This time, Anna was threatening the government with the same weapon since the Centre had failed in its promise.

In a televised interview before his arrest, Anna said that this is the time for a second Independence struggle. He urged the fellow countrymen to come together and court arrest so that the “prisons are packed to capacity”.

How sad. It seems he is not living in the 21^st century. Anna, rather unfortunately, still believes that the preachings of Mahatma Gandhi stand true in today’s times in this country.

India is a country where things run more on a ‘copycat procedure’. At the time when Anna was holding his fast in April, waves of protests had erupted in many parts of the world – particularly North Africa. Thus Anna’s fast got a big boost through the social networking sites. Reports reveal that many people who had then sided with Anna were either unaware of what the agenda was (except the clichéd word corruption) or were corrupt themselves.

The clever government agreed to Anna’s demands for the time being only to let the issue ‘cool down’. It was a well thought-of plan and it worked. Indian politics says that the people have a very short memory and less patience. They may raise their voice for a particular cause but will not be able to hold on to it for long.

Here in India, the people are busier with their daily lives than anything else. Whatever little education they receive, they are content when they get a ‘sarkari job’. The next step is to get married and the ‘customary’ give and take of dowry. In the next step they carry out the ‘necessary’ task of having a child. In a year or two, the first child needs a companion to play with and thus a second one is introduced in the household. Now mind it, the second one has to be a boy if the first one was not. In case the second one too turns out a girl (which is unlikely because of cases of sex determination), a third one is planned. The series will go on until the ‘saviour’ boy arrives.

The next step in a common man’s life is to feed his family. To do so he needs money and in this rising inflation living on a ‘sarkari’ pay is not easy especially if the man is little learned. Thus, exchanging hands under the table becomes a common act. Even if the person is unemployed, this will not deter him from marrying and having children (often seen in rural areas of the country).

This type of a common man constitutes more than 2/3^rd of this country’s population. Of the remaining 1/3^rd, at least 30 percent of the people have all the luxuries they need. This leaves only a few who may join their voices with Anna. But indifference to the nation is another factor that will chaff off many more from within the probables. Those left will be the only ones fighting for Anna and they will only have small section of the youth. 

Faces of middle aged and old men were seen on TV channels airing the protests live. Not many young guys were there on any of the 20 leading channels of the country.

The opportunistic youth of today are busy with their careers and, if possible, leave for ‘that foreign land’. Who said USA is the only country?

In India a century by Sachin Tendulkar is far too important than a disabled boy winning gold at a world championship. In India staring at Ambani’s Antilla means looking ‘up’. Who cares for the homeless?

In India election of a leader on the basis of his caste is mandatory. Is there a criminal case against the candidate? We don’t care.

In India ignoring traffic laws, evading responsibilities, using unethical means to climb the ladder and differentiating between ourselves on any basis are some of the ‘rules’ by which people we have been living and will live.  

This is not Gandhi’s India. The concept of Ahimsa now stands good only for a movie script.

Thus, Anna’s agitation will not continue as anticipated by him. Yes, there will be protests for some time in his support but not for long. It is an established fact that a battle overstretched is a battle lost.

What is the real problem with the Railways?

The Times of India published its views in today's paper on the Uttar Pradesh train accident that claimed 68 lives and injured 181 others. In its opinion under the headline 'Populist railway policies pushing up accident rate' the paper stated that the populist railway policies adopted by ministers from the Eastern part of the country were pushing up accident rate. The write-up seems to be politically influenced and does not reflects the ideology for which the paper claims it stands. 

The actual problem is not announcement of a slew of trains on the Delhi-Kolkata route by successive ministers from Bihar or Bengal as stated in the article. The real problem is POPULATION. Even today, some news channels were showing images of people climbing on the rooftops of the trains in Uttar Pradesh. One can witness the same situation in many parts of the country. It is the population explosion that has created a problem bigger than the flawed ministerial decisions.

Adding to the problem is the inherent desire of the people to cheat. What will any minister do if there are people who travel without tickets? What will the ministry do if the people themselves love to bypass rules? In case any minister DARES to punish them then all-hell will break loose. Won't the media criticize the minister? If someone from any other part of the country becomes the Railway minister, won't he/she favour his/her state?


A prudent person or in this case, a responsible media house, must meticulously observe any critical situation before passing a judgement never mind what facts they are based on. Yes, the decision by the minsters are wrong but they always are. Favoritism is ingrained in the ways of this country and we all are unfortunately living with it. Let us raise our thoughts beyond the filth of politics and we will be able to see how bad we ourselves are.


Just for the sake of the readers:

http://lite.epaper.timesofindia.com/getpage.aspx?pageid=10&pagesize=&edid=TOI&edlabel=TOIM&mydateHid=12-07-2011&pubname=Times+of+India+-+Mumbai&edname=Mumbai&publabel=TOI

http://www.newsyaps.com/india/29-national/1982-how-the-west-bengal-was-won

On Newsyaps

http://www.newsyaps.com/india/29-national/1984-the-problem-with-indian-media

The ‘Red’ and ‘Green’ of West Bengal

Mamata Banerjee has done it. She has ended the 34 year reign of the Communists over the state of West Bengal. The news reports, articles and other write-ups published today are all praise of the charismatic wave created by her that made the public ‘dare to defy’ the Reds.

Honestly, elections in Bengal had become too boring. Each time the polls came around, the colour of Red was splashed all over the state as if there was no other colour available in the Legislative palette. For the first time in 34 years a new colour has emerged, that of Green. The victory of the Trinamool Congress was palpable from the manner in which they took the lead as soon as the counting began. By the afternoon, the victory was imminent. Expectedly, the supporters of Didi and her party were out on the streets singing, dancing and celebrating that in a way emblematic of the City of Joy. This time, however, the ‘City’ had expanded to mean the State itself.

 

The Communists had desperately tried to colour the entire state with Red flags this time again. They had perhaps thought that the people were still thinking of shedding their blood for them even if they didn’t do anything for the people. However, their colour did not fail to leave a mark. Only this time, the mark worked against them. Red was the colour on the people’s faces when they were seething on the failure of the gone government. Red with blood was the colour of the soil of Lalgarh. Red was the colour of the state economy which was signaling its total failure over the last three decades. Red was symbolized the shame on the faces of the CPI (M) members, including Buddhadeb Bhattacharya, when they were shown the exit door by the people.

Not for once did the people stop to think about the fallen comrades. They were too happy to do that. After all, they had been delivered from the ‘tyranny’ of the Leftists and their obscure ideologies. Didi was ‘hope’ clad in a saree and ordinary slippers. She walked her way into their hearts of people and ignited their souls with the dream of seeing development in a state that was unable to pay salaries to them. With the promise in mind, the people have given her the chance she desperately sought. They showed their allegiance towards her by smearing themselves and others with green abir (powder colour).

This colour of Green has the potential to become the new colour of Bengal. Green symbolizes prosperity and environment. Truly, there is now a new environment in and around Kolkata. The wind of change is expected to give back the trees their original colour. Expectations are on a very high pedestal. Rise in employment opportunities, growth in industries, beneficial agrarian sector, decrease in crime rates and elimination of the maoists are a few of the things expected from the new government. In other words, the people are expecting the government to give a green signal to restart the stalled economic machinery of the state.

Trinamool means grassroots which has the colour of green. Green was the agenda at Singur. The time has come for the party to mean its name. Bengal needs a complete makeover and it is now the task of Trinamool and Mamata Banerjee to paint the state Green. If they succeed in their endeavour then the Leftists are sure to turn Green with envy. Colours of politics have therefore a much deeper meaning.

Links to my articles on Newsyaps

Please click on the links below to read my articles on Newsyaps.

http://www.newsyaps.com/world/82-us/1978-miles-to-go-before-we-sleeppeacefully

http://www.newsyaps.com/india/29-national/1977-a-lesson-for-the-army-and-media

http://www.newsyaps.com/component/content/article/369-opinion/1974-testing-the-education-system-in-india

http://www.newsyaps.com/entertainment/91-celebrities/1980-john-and-bips-the-end-after-nine

We v/s We

Anna Hazare, probably India’s most influential social activist, has staged a fast-unto-death to root out the biggest epidemic of the country—corruption. People across cities and from all ages have joined in support of the Gandhian style protest through candlelight marches, fasting for a day or promoting the cause itself. Many are calling it the Jasmine revolution of South Asia. Such has been the effect of the demonstrations that a prominent minister has stepped down from his position in an elite government group.

The large numbers of people who have turned up to express their support to Anna are proof of the growing resentment in the masses against corruption and political parties. In an article written earlier which found place in a leading newspaper, I had mentioned that if we have to put the blame of corrupting the country on any one person then that has to be ‘us’. Yes, collectively it is ‘us’ who are corrupt and strangely, today we are rising against ‘us’.

The demonstrators are asking for new powers in an old law (as if the already existing laws were not enough). Obviously, the government is trying to downplay the demands. Opposition political parties are trying, somewhat in vain, to gain milage out of the tumultuous situation. The great Indian Media has big news in the post World Cup scenario.

Protests are not new to this nation. We have been protesting since— God knows when. Some of those protests were successful while others failed. It was the protests that led to our Independence. The media and the people equal this agitation to the one that were held in the pre-Independence era. However, there is a difference.

The protests before 1947 were against a government and a class that was entirely foreign in all aspects of a civilization. Everything is different between the societal customs of the British and the South Asians. This time, the people are opposing a few of their own. Ironically, those few were elected by the very same people who are out on the streets today. In this regard the Jasmine revolution that swept the sands of North Africa is closer in comparison. Yet again, there is a difference.

The one that happened in the desert nations was a movement of those who thought on the same plane. The demonstrators were a mixed lot of high class and low class people, filthy rich and pathetically poor individuals, people from different ideologies or religions irrespective of their societal standing. On the other hand, India is a country of 1.2 billion people and is far more divided in societal structure than any other country in the world. Thus, it is extremely difficult to generate public opinion for a good cause. Why?

Look at the World Cup that ended on a happy note for India. Tickets were in great demand and this led to black-marketing. Tickets worth Rs 25 were being sold at Rs 25,000. Someone was ready to sell off his kidney for a ticket so that he could watch the game. Millions were spent in a matter of days and billions were earned by the corporates and the BCCI. As for the cricketers, do I need to write anything about them and their incomes?

On the night India won the World Cup, 18 million children went to sleep on the streets of this very same country. They do it every day. While many of us were busy in celebrations, thousands (maybe lakhs) were wondering about their next day’s meal. My simple question is: If the people of this country have so much money to spend on brands and an overpriced ticket for a match, then why hasn’t the number of poor in this country reduced? If the owners of big corporates have enough money to spend on palatial 26 storey buildings for their personal comfort, then why are those 18 million children sleeping on the streets?

No revolution can find success until everyone takes part in it irrespective of differences. Human psychology is weird; they may say something and do the other. Before trying to root out corruption, it is necessary to root out the greedy side within us. That is difficult, very difficult in this materialistic society.

Akbar: The greatest of all HR managers

The only thing that can make a difference between success and failure is management. An effective form of management increases the chances of success for any business, organisation, government, society or individual and bad management brings failure to their doorstep. There are many things that are taught in the Management colleges the world over. Here in India we have 1600 plus institutions that produce over 1 lakh managers each year. Probably that is the reason why we have a problem of plenty resulting in ‘over-management’ of the nation.
To address the ‘problem of plenty’, nearly all B-schools offer a course on Human Resource Management. Every aspect of handling the most essential part of an organisation— the man-power— is taught. However, we have a lot of cases, some known and others unknown, which clearly show that NO ONE CAN BECOME A GOOD MANAGER BY GETTING A DEGREE IN MANAGEMENT.

The biggest problem in our educational institutions is that a large majority of teachers do not teach by example. Thus, even though I am not a teacher (and am also not an MBA), I think I can share an extremely valuable information with you all.

India’s history is resplendent with examples of all kinds. Without going into any other example, I bring to you two kings. Both are from the medieval history of the Indian sub-continent.

The first one was a well-educated Sultan who not only had profound knowledge on logic, philosophy, astro science, mathematics and medicine but also had certain qualities fit for a king. The second one was simply illiterate. With only this much description you may have formed an opinion that the first one must have proved to be a great ruler while the other must have failed his kingdom. However, if I clarify that the name of the first ruler was Mohammed Bin Tughlaq while the second one was Jalaluddin Mohammed Akbar, what will be your opinion then?

It is widely known that Tughlaq was a whimsical ruler. His eccentric manners and mismanagement brought his downfall. Even his education could not save him. On the other hand, Akbar began his rule at a very young age (14 to be precise) and therefore he did not get any chance to read or write. He knew only one language throughout his formative years and that was the language of the sword. Later on he patronized music, architecture, arts and positive religious debates that firmly built on his reputation as a tolerant Mughal ruler.

Although illiterate, Akbar was a sound judge of character. The nine gems in his court were handpicked by him and each was a master in one way or the other. The reason why he became the most successful medieval ruler in Indian history is this aspect of his character. He simply knew who the right man for the right job was. He never erred in his decisions and was a very intelligent administrator.

He is therefore the greatest of all HR managers. There are many modern day managers who are on responsible positions but they themselves have no control on their own lives so how can they judge another? Akbar did not attain the title of ‘the Great’ for his military exploits but for his administrative acumen which proved equally effective as his victories in battles. It is very difficult to choose the right man but had it been that easy, all of us would have post-fixed ‘the Great’ to our names.

Bruce Lee, the 'Master' who taught me

Fists of Tiger and mind of Dragon

Today, while surfing the internet for some quotable quotes, I came upon a website where I found the man who originally uttered those famous words that I wrote about in an earlier article, titled 'My Thanks to KBC' on this blog.

The same quote was reiterated by Bollywood superstar, Amitabh Bachchan on KBC- season 1.

The quote:

"He who knows not and knows not he knows not, He is a fool- Shun him. He who knows not and knows he knows not, He is simple- Teach him. He who knows and knows not he knows, He is asleep- Awaken him. He who knows and knows that he knows, He is wise- follow him."

The original speaker is none other than the immortal Bruce Lee (http://www.quotesnsayings.com/martial-arts/). I always wondered who could have said something that was enough to define the types of people in any society.

Truly, 'the Master' had more to him than just kicks and punches. Thank you, 'Shifu' for it is your words that have made me what I am today.